Investigating the quality of HIV rapid testing practices in public antenatal health care facilities
South Africa
Duduzile F. Nsiband, Selamawit A. Woldesenbet, Adrian Puren, Peter Barron, Vincent I. Maduna, Carl Lombard, Mireille Cheyip, Mary Mogashoa, Yogan Pillay, Vuyolwethu Magasana, Trisha Ramraj, Tendesayi Kufa, Gurpreet Kindra, Ameena Goga, Witness Chirinda
Created on
April 29, 2022
Last modified
April 29, 2022
Page views
29077
Download
4
Documentation in PDF
Metadata
DDI/XML
JSON
- Data files
- data
test_c_5_9 (test_c_5_9)
Data file: data
Overview
Valid:
131
Type:
Discrete
Width:
255
Range:
-
Format:
character
Questions and instructions
Categories
| Value | Category | Cases | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Counsellors confirm and sign on their own | 1 |
0.8%
|
|
| Do not do QC | 1 |
0.8%
|
|
| Dont do QC | 1 |
0.8%
|
|
| Gauteng | 1 |
0.8%
|
|
| If so all records will be available and in order. | 1 |
0.8%
|
|
| Last signed in 2014 | 1 |
0.8%
|
|
| NO QC | 1 |
0.8%
|
|
| Never had invalid results | 1 |
0.8%
|
|
| No QC | 2 |
1.5%
|
|
| No evidence | 1 |
0.8%
|
|
| No implementation | 1 |
0.8%
|
|
| No recent QC done | 1 |
0.8%
|
|
| No record | 2 |
1.5%
|
|
| No record on registet | 1 |
0.8%
|
|
| No records | 9 |
6.9%
|
|
| No records of Q.C | 1 |
0.8%
|
|
| No records of review. | 1 |
0.8%
|
|
| No records seen | 2 |
1.5%
|
|
| No training | 2 |
1.5%
|
|
| No, they were not viewed | 1 |
0.8%
|
|
| Not enrolled | 1 |
0.8%
|
|
| Not all signed | 1 |
0.8%
|
|
| Not consisted clearly no one is checking, some records were missing. | 1 |
0.8%
|
|
| Not doibg QC specimens | 1 |
0.8%
|
|
| Not doing QC | 20 |
15.3%
|
|
| Not doing QC samples | 1 |
0.8%
|
|
| Not doing QC specimens | 3 |
2.3%
|
|
| Not done | 21 |
16%
|
|
| Not done yet | 2 |
1.5%
|
|
| Not enrolled | 3 |
2.3%
|
|
| Not reviewed by person incharge | 1 |
0.8%
|
|
| Not reviewed. | 2 |
1.5%
|
|
| Not routinely | 1 |
0.8%
|
|
| Not routinely reviewed by the person in charge | 1 |
0.8%
|
|
| Not seen | 1 |
0.8%
|
|
| Not signed by the person in charge | 1 |
0.8%
|
|
| Not signs | 1 |
0.8%
|
|
| Not trained | 6 |
4.6%
|
|
| Not trained on QC | 2 |
1.5%
|
|
| Not used | 2 |
1.5%
|
|
| Not yet trained | 1 |
0.8%
|
|
| On the column of recieved by, no one has ever signed | 1 |
0.8%
|
|
| QC not done | 6 |
4.6%
|
|
| QC records not reviewed by the person incharge routinely | 1 |
0.8%
|
|
| QC records not routinely reviewed by the oerson in charge | 1 |
0.8%
|
|
| Reviewed by person doing it herself | 1 |
0.8%
|
|
| She has not signed for about 2 months | 1 |
0.8%
|
|
| Some reviewed some not reviewed | 1 |
0.8%
|
|
| There are not supervised at facility level, someone from district inservices them but is not the to monitor what there are doing. | 1 |
0.8%
|
|
| There is no signing | 1 |
0.8%
|
|
| They are trained awaiting, serum sample | 1 |
0.8%
|
|
| They dont do QC | 1 |
0.8%
|
|
| no records | 6 |
4.6%
|
|
| not checked | 1 |
0.8%
|
|
| not routinely | 1 |
0.8%
|
|
| not trained on QC | 1 |
0.8%
|
|
| yes but information not complete there are gaps. | 1 |
0.8%
|
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.